During the nineteenth century pageantry became an increasingly important, ritualized facet of the Royal Navy and altered its relationship with the public.[1] Fleet Reviews no longer represented a true ‘inspection’ of the ship by the monarch but were a carefully choreographed spectacle designed to be witnessed by the public.[2] Similarly ship launches moved beyond the bounds of closed-off shipyards but became, as Margarette Lincoln opined, ‘exciting event[s]’ that drew large crowds together.[3] Yet, limited work has been undertaken on the complexities of pageantry and naval ceremony.[4] In particular, few have asked what sailors thought about the ceremonies in which they were often key participants. This article hopes to give a brief insight into how sailors viewed such events.
For men of the lower deck naval pageantry meant extra hard work. Jan Rüger gave the example of a stoker named Robert Percival who suggested, in his private diary, that there were persistent grumblings below deck during naval celebrations.[5] Percival emphasises this point: ‘to the man in the street, no doubt, [it] would be looked upon as a spectacle, but to the initiated, every smoking funnel meant Work’.[6] However, Rüger demonstrated that feelings of animosity were also combined with a sense of pride.[7] Other sailors are less forthright and it is the ‘silence’ that gives an insight into their thoughts.[8] For example Albert Kneller regularly described dressing the ship, always in a very matter-of-fact way without much enthusiasm or complaint.[9] Similarly, Edwin Fletcher mentioned dressing the ship for inspections and port visits with little enthusiasm, however he always kept a note of whom they saw and what the occasion was.[10] He recorded a visit on board by Queen Alexandra in 1905 in particular detail betraying some sense of his interest and pride.[11]
Therefore it can be suggested that there was no silent consensus amongst sailors.[12] Sailors did not necessarily keep their views to themselves. Instead, pageantry created a domain where ‘public appearances and private views could coexist.’[13] For the average man of the lower deck naval ceremonies meant extra work and harsh scrutiny, but they could still feel a sense of pride in the navy and in Britain.[14]
References
[1] For an understanding of ‘invented traditions’ see Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger (ed.), The Invention of Tradition, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 [first edition 1983]).
[2] Jan Rüger, The Great Naval Game: Britain and Germany in the Age of Empire, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 [first edition 2007]); 16-17.
[3] Margarette Lincoln, ‘Naval Ship Launches as Public Spectacle 1773-1854’, Mariner’s Mirror, 83, 1997.; 466-472, 466.
[4] See Rüger, The Great Naval Game; Margarette Lincoln, ‘Naval Ship Launches’, and the unpublished D.Phil. by Silvia Rodgers, The Symbolism of Ship Launching in the Royal Navy, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983).
[5] Rüger, The Great Naval Game, 123.; RNM, 1988/294: Diary of Robert Percival.
[6] RNM, 1988/294: Diary of Robert Percival.
[7] Rüger, The Great Naval Game, 123.
[8] For further information on the dangers and limitations of using diaries see Christopher McKee, Sober Men and True: Sailor Lives in the Royal Navy 1900-1945, (London: Harvard University Press, 2002); 6-8.
[9] 207/90(1): Diary of Albert Kneller.
[10] 151/80(1): Diary of Edwin Fletcher.; 151/80(2): Diary of Edwin Fletcher.
[11] 151/80(1): Diary of Edwin Fletcher.
[12] Rüger, The Great Naval Game, 122.
[13] Rüger, The Great Naval Game, 124.
[14] Rüger, The Great Naval Game, 123.
Comments are closed.